Toggle light / dark theme

Oldest Moon Craters Are Best Targets for Water Ice

“We found that the earlier a region became shadowed, the larger the area that was able to accumulate ice,” said Dr. Oded Aharonson. [ https://www.labroots.com/trending/space/30512/moon-craters-targets-water-ice-2](https://www.labroots.com/trending/space/30512/moon-craters-targets-water-ice-2)


What are the best places on the Moon to find water ice that can be used for future crewed missions to the Moon’s surface? This is what a recent study published in Nature Astronomy hopes to address as a team of scientists investigated potential regions of the Moon where future astronauts could have the highest chance of finding water ice. This study has the potential to help scientists, engineers, mission planners, and future astronauts narrow the scope for finding the best locations of water ice on the Moon to aid in future crewed missions, thus negating the need for water supplies from Earth.

For the study, the researchers analyze data obtained from the Lyman-Alpha Mapping Project (LAMP), which is an instrument on the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter designed to map the entire surface of the Moon in far ultraviolet light. They combined these findings with computer models designed to simulate how and when water was delivered to the Moon millions to billions of years ago.

In the end, the researchers found that Shackleton Crater, a portion of which is located directly at the lunar south pole, is not the most ideal location for water ice, which has long been thought. In contrast, the researchers propose that Haworth Crater is the ideal location for finding water ice. Additionally, the researchers found that some of these regions have been building water ice for as long as 1.5 billion years.

Astronomers explore the surface composition of a nearby super-Earth

Using MIRI (Mid-Infrared Instrument) on board the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), a team of researchers led by former MPIA (Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Heidelberg, Germany) Ph.D. student Sebastian Zieba (Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian, Cambridge, U.S.) and Laura Kreidberg, MPIA Director and study PI (principal investigator), analyzed the surface composition of the rocky exoplanet LHS 3844 b.

A bright moon may dim the Eta Aquarid meteor shower made up of Halley’s comet debris

The Eta Aquarid meteor shower soon will light the sky with debris from Halley’s comet. But a bright moon will spoil the fun this year, making the display harder to glimpse.

The shower will peak Tuesday night into Wednesday morning. Viewers from the Southern Hemisphere typically see 50 meteors per hour during the peak, but the interfering moon could cut that number by half. In the north, skywatchers will likely see fewer than 10 per hour.

“For us in the Northern Hemisphere, it’s not going to be as impressive,” said Teri Gee, manager of the Barlow Planetarium in Wisconsin. “The farther south you are, the better you’ll see it.”

Star Trek vs Star Wars: The Truth About Who Would REALLY Win

What happens when two of the greatest sci-fi universes collide? ⚔️
In this deep-dive, we break down the ultimate showdown: Star Trek vs Star Wars — and uncover the TRUTH about who would actually win.

This isn’t just fan debate. We’re analyzing technology, weapons, strategy, and realism to answer the question once and for all. From the advanced warp-driven fleets of the United Federation of Planets to the Force-wielding dominance of the Galactic Empire, every advantage and weakness is put under the microscope.

Could a Star Destroyer overpower the USS Enterprise?
Is the Force the ultimate trump card?
Or does superior engineering give Star Trek the edge?

This video dives into:

Starship combat and firepower ⚡
Shields vs deflectors 🛡️
Warp speed vs hyperspace 🚀
AI, tactics, and battle strategy 🧠
The real science behind both universes.

By the end, you’ll see which universe holds the TRUE advantage—and why the answer might surprise you.

Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser: Does the Future Affect the Present?

The Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser explained simply provides a shocking answer to whether the future affects the past. Could it be possible that that the future can influence the present? An enhanced version of the famous double slit experiment, called the delayed choice quantum eraser implies exactly that mind blowing scenario – that future events can influence past results.

What exactly is a delayed choice quantum eraser, and how can it possibly show that the future is affecting the past? In 1978, a physicist by the name of John Archibald Wheeler proposed a thought experiment, called delayed choice. Wheeler’s idea was to imagine light from a distant quasar being gravitationally lensed by a closer galaxy. Wheeler noted that this light could be observed on earth in two different ways. This is called a delayed choice because the observer’s choice of selecting how to measure the particle is being done billions of years from the time that the particle left the quasar.

But how could this be?…the light began its journey billions of years ago, long before we decided on which experiment to perform. It would seem as if the quasar light “knew” whether it would be seen as a particle or wave billions of years before the experiment was even devised on earth. Does this prove that somehow the particle’s measurement of its current state has influenced its state in the past? The act of measurement gives reality to the quantum particle. So in the delayed-choice experiment, this means the quantum doesn’t become “real” until you measure it. So this experiment does not prove that the present has influenced the past because the light could have been a wave and particle at the same time, and only become real when it was measured.

However, another more recent experiment set up used a more complicated method to determine this idea of the future influencing a past. It introduced something called the quantum eraser to the delayed choice. So it is called the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser designed by Kim, Kulik, Shih and Scully in 1999.

It is a complicated construction that introduced entangled pairs of photons to Wheeler’s delayed choice experiment.

I am going to show you a much simpler set up that will illustrate this concept in easier-to-understand terms. The results of this experiment are pretty amazing — because Here’s what happens. It tells us that when the which way information is known, that is, when the detector can ascertain which slit the photon came from, it always presents as a particle. But when the detector cannot ascertain which slit the photon came from, that is, when the which way information is erased, then the photon acts like a wave.

How Physicists Proved The Universe Isn’t Locally Real — Nobel Prize in Physics 2022 EXPLAINED

Alain Aspect, John Clauser and Anton Zeilinger conducted ground breaking experiments using entangled quantum states, where two particles behave like a single unit even when they are separated. Their results have cleared the way for new technology based upon quantum information.

Merch!
I think Scientists are Rockstars so I made t-shirts to celebrate it
Einstein Rockstar Tee: https://www.drbenmiles.com/merch/p/rockstar-scientist-tee-einstein
Curie Rockstar Tee: https://www.drbenmiles.com/merch/p/rockstar-scientist-tee-einstein Rockstar Tee: https://www.drbenmiles.com/merch/p/ro

0:00 The 2022 Physics Nobel Prize
0:51 Is the Universe Real?
1:58 Einstein’s Problem with Quantum Mechanics
5:09 The Hunt for Quantum Proof
7:37 The First Successful Experiment
11:06 So What?

#Einstein #nobelprize #entanglement.

Interested in what I do? Sign up to my Newsletter.
100% free forever and good for the environment.
https://drbenmiles.substack.com/

My Links:

What are the Strings in String Theory?

Viewers like you help make PBS (Thank you 😃). Support your local PBS Member Station here: https://to.pbs.org/DonateSPACE

To learn more about 23andMe head to https://23andme.com/spacetime.

Why strings? What are they made of? How did physicists even come up with this bizarre idea? And what’s all this nonsense of extra dimensions?

You can further support us on Patreon at / pbsspacetime.

Get your own Space Time t­-shirt at http://bit.ly/1QlzoBi.

Tweet at us! @pbsspacetime.

Stanford CS25: Transformers United V6 I From Representation Learning to World Modeling

For more information about Stanford’s graduate programs, visit: https://online.stanford.edu/graduate-educationApril

April 9, 2026
This seminar covers:
• How world models are increasingly moving away from reconstruction and toward prediction in latent space.
• Two recent JEPA-based approaches that illustrate this shift from complementary angles.

Follow along with the seminar schedule. Visit: https://web.stanford.edu/class/cs25/

Guest Speakers: Hazel Nam & Lucas Maes (Brown University)

Instructors:
• Steven Feng, Stanford Computer Science PhD student and NSERC PGS-D scholar.
• Karan P. Singh, Electrical Engineering PhD student and NSF Graduate Research Fellow in the Stanford Translational AI Lab.
• Michael C. Frank, Benjamin Scott Crocker Professor of Human Biology Director, Symbolic Systems Program.
• Christopher Manning, Thomas M. Siebel Professor in Machine Learning, Professor of Linguistics and of Computer Science, Co-Founder and Senior Fellow of the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI)

The Unseen Monster Pulling Our Galaxy: The Great Attractor Explained

Welcome back to the Bureau of The Unexplained! 👽🌌 Where we dive into all things weird and unexplained.

Right now, as you sit watching this video, you are hurtling through space. The Milky Way galaxy, along with roughly 100,000 of our neighboring galaxies, is being dragged at millions of miles per hour toward a mysterious, terrifying gravitational anomaly. Scientists call it… The Great Attractor.

For decades, astronomers had no idea what it was. Why? Because it sits directly behind the \.

Slower access, faster chemistry: Nanoreactor design improves catalysis by balancing molecular flow

A new study by a team at Tohoku University, published in Chemical Engineering Journal, has shown that more isn’t always better when it comes to nanoscale chemical reactions. One might think that giving reactants completely unrestricted access to a speed-boosting catalyst would be the fastest way to drive a chemical reaction. Instead, it was shown that hollow nanoreactors can work more efficiently when transport into the reaction space is slightly restricted.

A nanoreactor is a porous shell that surrounds an inner space containing catalytically active nanoparticles. The inner space where reactions occur provides a special environment which opens the door for unique and highly useful chemical reactions. Finding ways to optimize reactions in these confined spaces could help to produce a myriad of everyday products more efficiently, and at a lower price.

While it might seem like flooding this inner space would get things done the fastest, researchers found that the key to optimization involved holding back a little.

/* */