A delicate interference experiment elucidates the collective behavior of quasiparticles that are neither bosons nor fermions, but something in between.
When you live in theory-land, as I do, anyons in fractional quantum Hall (FQH) systems are an emblem of elegance. They address a fundamental question in quantum mechanics—the classification of indistinguishable particles—by breaking the long-rooted dichotomy between fermions and bosons and replacing it with a continuum of possibilities. Their implications are far reaching. Anyons account for the “hierarchy” of FQH states and they inspire visions of topologically protected quantum computation [1]. In experiment-land, the most direct manifestation of anyons is the phase that the system’s wave function acquires when two anyons are interchanged or when one winds around another. This phase is at the heart of a new experiment performed by Noah Samuelson and Andrea Young of the University of California, Santa Barbara, and their collaborators [2].
A research team has discovered a new way to control tiny magnetic properties inside materials using electric current, which could possibly pave the way for new types of computing technologies. The work is based on spintronics, a field that uses not only the electric charge of electrons but also their “spin,” a quantum property that can be thought of as a tiny magnet.
Spintronics is already used in magnetic random access memory (MRAM), a type of memory that keeps data even when the power is turned off. This is different from conventional memory, which loses information without electricity.
In MRAM, data is stored depending on whether spins point “up” or “down.” These two stable states are separated by an energy barrier, which helps keep the data secure. However, this stability also makes it harder to switch between states, requiring strong electric currents.
Researchers have proposed that a newly identified class of magnetic materials could extend the zero-resistance currents of superconductors to electron spins. Publishing their calculations in Physical Review X, Kyle Monkman and colleagues at the University of British Columbia propose how “altermagnets” could enable persistent spin currents to flow without dissipation. If confirmed experimentally, the effect could provide a powerful new platform for spintronics, where information is encoded in spin rather than electric charge.
The ability to transport spins over long distances is a central challenge in spintronics. In conventional metals and semiconductors, spin currents decay rapidly due to effects that randomize electron spins. One promising workaround has been superconducting spintronics, where dissipationless charge transport is combined with magnetic materials. However, these hybrid systems often suffer from intrinsic drawbacks, including stray magnetic fields that can interfere with nearby components, suppressing superconductivity.
First confirmed in 2024, altermagnets offer a potential way around these problems. Like antiferromagnets (where a magnetic dipole’s spin is always opposite to those of its neighbors), they have zero net magnetization, avoiding unwanted magnetic fields.
The ALICE Collaboration takes a step further in addressing the question of whether a quark–gluon plasma can be formed in proton–proton and proton–nucleus collisions. In the first few microseconds after the Big Bang, the universe was in an extremely hot and dense state of matter known as quark–gluon plasma (QGP), which can be reproduced with high-energy collisions between heavy ions such as lead nuclei.
In a paper published in Nature Communications, the ALICE Collaboration reports observing a remarkable common pattern in proton–proton, proton–lead and lead–lead collisions at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), shedding new light on possible QGP formation and evolution in small collision systems.
Physicists initially believed that colliding small systems, such as protons, could not generate the extreme temperatures and pressures needed to form QGP. But in recent years, signatures of QGP have been observed in proton–proton and proton–lead collisions at the LHC, indicating that the size of the collision system may not be a limiting factor in QGP creation.
“I like to say that physics is hard because physics is easy, by which I mean we actually think about physics as students.”
Up next, The Multiverse is real. Just not in the way you think it is. ► • The Multiverse is real. Just not in the wa…
Physics seems complicated, until you realize why it works so well, says physicist Sean Carroll, revealing the basis of the field’s greatest successes: Radical simplicity.
Carroll takes us from Newton’s clockwork universe to Laplace’s demon, to Einstein’s spacetime revolution, exploring the historical shockwaves each breakthrough caused. If you’ve wondered how stripping the world down to its simplest parts can reveal deeper truths, this is where that story begins.
00:00:00 Radical simplicity in physics. 00:00:55 Chapter 1: The physics of free will. 00:04:55 Laplace’s Demon. 00:06:27 The clockwork universe paradigm. 00:07:41 Determinism and compatibilism. 00:08:45 Chapter 2: The invention of spacetime. 00:17:30: Einstein’s general theory of relativity. 00:24:27 Chapter 3: The quantum revolution. 00:28:05 The 2 biggest ideas in physics. 00:32:27 Visualizing physics. 00:38:17 Quantum field theory. 00:46:51 The Higgs boson particle. 00:47:28 The standard model of particle physics. 00:52:53 The core theory of physics. 01:02:03 The measurement problem. 01:13:47 Chapter 4: The power of collective genius. 01:16:19 A timeline of the theories of physics.
We only ever experience three spatial dimensions, but quantum lab experiments suggest a whole new side to reality – weird particle apparitions included.
About New Scientist: New Scientist was founded in 1956 for “all those interested in scientific discovery and its social consequences”. Today our website, videos, newsletters, app, podcast and print magazine cover the world’s most important, exciting and entertaining science news as well as asking the big-picture questions about life, the universe, and what it means to be human.
Sign Up on Patreon to get access to the Space Time Discord! / pbsspacetime.
Fermilab physicists really care about the mass of the W boson. They spent nearly a decade recording collisions in the Tevatron collider and another decade analysing the data. This culminated in the April 7 announcement that this obscure particle’s mass seems to be heavier than expected. So why do we care? Because understanding why this particle even has mass was one of the most important breakthroughs in our understanding of the subatomic world. And because measuring its precise mass either doubles down on our current understanding or reveals a path to an even deeper knowledge. The FermiLab discrepancy is a tantalizing hint of the latter.
Need Catch Up On Your Fundamental Forces? • The Fundamental Forces & The Standard Model.
🚨 THE UNIVERSE NEVER FORGETS. NOT A SINGLE MOMENT. You burned a book. The words are gone. The pages are ash. But physics says every letter still exists — scattered across trillions of particles, encoded in the quantum state of reality. And it’s not just books. Every breath you’ve ever taken. Every word you’ve ever spoken. Every person you’ve ever lost. The information is still here. Right now. Permanently. 🔴 WHAT YOU’LL DISCOVER: 🔴 Why burning something doesn’t destroy its information. 🔴 How Stephen Hawking lost the biggest bet in physics history. 🔴 The black hole war that nearly broke quantum mechanics. 🔴 Why spacetime itself is made of information. 🔴 What this means about death — and why nothing truly disappears. ⚠️ WARNING: After this video, you will never look at destruction the same way again. Like and subscribe for more reality-breaking physics. physics, quantum mechanics, information paradox, black holes, Hawking radiation, holographic principle, entropy, universe, science, reality, quantum information, spacetime, Leonard Susskind, Stephen Hawking, ER EPR.
Sabine Hossenfelder, Ivette Fuentes and James Ladyman discuss the scaling laws of the universe and the fundamental nature of reality.
Is the universe one thing, or many things?
With a free trial, you can watch the full debate NOW at https://iai.tv/video/the-one-and-the–… central question in ancient Greek philosophy was the problem of the One and the Many. It is a question that has echoed across Western culture and is still with us today. Should we see the world as a coherent whole or a multitude of separate parts? The puzzle is that we need both the whole and the parts, but an explanation of the relationship between them has proved problematic and perhaps unknowable. In contemporary physics, the parts are the teeming world of particle physics, and these should make up the cosmological world of the universe as a whole and the overall framework of Einsteinian space-time. But as yet we have not been able to combine the two coherently. Is looking at the universe from the small scale and the large always going to be incompatible? Does it mean a theory of everything is an illusion and the attempt to combine quantum mechanics and Einstein’s general relativity a forlorn project? Or is the parallel with the ancient Greek puzzle accidental and the current challenge one that might be overcome? #quantumphysics #universe #philosophy #fundamentalunits #theoryofeverything Sabine Hossenfelder is a theoretical physicist and acclaimed science communicator, known for her sharp critiques of the scientific mainstream. She is also a best-selling author and YouTuber. Ivette Fuentes is a theoretical quantum physicist at the University of Southampton and Emmy Fellow at the University of Oxford. James Ladyman is a philosopher of science at the University of Bristol. He is best known for his book Every Thing Must Go, calling for a metaphysics grounded in physics and complexity science. Hosted by Jack Symes. 00:40 James Ladyman on the different notions of scale 02:39 Sabine Hossenfelder on energy in the universe 05:19 Ivette Fuentes on unifying quantum mechanics and general relativity 09:00 Is the universe “One” or “Many”? 17:15 Particles are not fundamental The Institute of Art and Ideas features videos and articles from cutting edge thinkers discussing the ideas that are shaping the world, from metaphysics to string theory, technology to democracy, aesthetics to genetics. Subscribe today! https://iai.tv/subscribe?utm_source=Y… For debates and talks: https://iai.tv For articles: https://iai.tv/articles For courses: https://iai.tv/iai-academy/courses.
A central question in ancient Greek philosophy was the problem of the One and the Many. It is a question that has echoed across Western culture and is still with us today. Should we see the world as a coherent whole or a multitude of separate parts? The puzzle is that we need both the whole and the parts, but an explanation of the relationship between them has proved problematic and perhaps unknowable. In contemporary physics, the parts are the teeming world of particle physics, and these should make up the cosmological world of the universe as a whole and the overall framework of Einsteinian space-time. But as yet we have not been able to combine the two coherently.
Is looking at the universe from the small scale and the large always going to be incompatible? Does it mean a theory of everything is an illusion and the attempt to combine quantum mechanics and Einstein’s general relativity a forlorn project? Or is the parallel with the ancient Greek puzzle accidental and the current challenge one that might be overcome?
